PairBook
HomeDZZ › DZZ vs GDX

DZZ vs GDX: Correlation

DB Gold Double Short ETN due February 15, 2038 (DZZ) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.32.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.32
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.31
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.36
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1160.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are DZZ and GDX?

On 3 years of weekly data the DZZ/GDX correlation comes out at -0.32, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.31 over 1 year against -0.32 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.36, and annualized covariance runs at -1160.2 %².

Among the 73 assets we track against DZZ, GDX ranks #65 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months GDX outperformed by 78.5 percentage points (-8.6% for DZZ against +69.9% for GDX). One caveat on sizing: DZZ is 2.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

DZZ vs GDX: side by side

DZZ (DB Gold Double Short ETN due February 15, 2038)GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF)
1-year return-8.6%+69.9%
5-year return-40.0%+245.5%
Volatility (ann.)89.0%40.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.360.88
Max drawdown (3Y)-83.1%-38.9%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · Commodities
Smaller drawdown: GDX -38.9% vs -83.1%Higher 5y return: GDX +245.5% vs -40.0%
-9%0%+254%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. DZZ · GDX

Year-by-year returns

YearDZZGDX
2022+3.0%-9.0%
2023-8.3%+10.0%
2024-35.0%+10.6%
2025+132.7%+154.8%
2026-57.2%+20.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are DZZ and GDX good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.32 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between DZZ and GDX?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between DZZ and GDX is -0.32 over 3 years, -0.31 over 1 year and -0.36 over 5 years.

Is GDX a good diversifier for DZZ?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.32 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.32 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.32 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/dzz-vs-gdx.json

DZZ vs GDX: 3-year weekly correlation -0.32DZZ vs GDX-0.32

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![DZZ vs GDX correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/dzz-vs-gdx.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/dzz-vs-gdx/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: DZZ correlations · GDX correlations