PairBook
HomeCXM › CXM vs VXX

CXM vs VXX: Correlation

How closely do Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN (VXX) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.34, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.34
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.19
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.35
long-run
Ann. covariance
-835.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CXM and VXX?

Over the past 3 years, CXM and VXX moved with a correlation of -0.34, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.19 versus -0.34 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.35, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -835.9 %².

VXX is close to the least connected end of CXM's tracked universe, ranking #11 of 13. The last year tells two different stories: CXM led by 41.4 percentage points, -8.3% for CXM against -49.7% for VXX. Risk is not evenly split, since VXX carries 1.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CXM vs VXX: side by side

CXM (Sprinklr, Inc.)VXX (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return-8.3%-49.7%
5-year return-49.6%-95.6%
Volatility (ann.)40.4%60.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.91-3.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-71.1%-83.3%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)61.1
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CXM -71.1% vs -83.3%Higher 5y return: CXM -49.6% vs -95.6%
-49%0%+11%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CXM · VXX

Year-by-year returns

YearCXMVXX
2022-48.5%-23.8%
2023+47.4%-72.5%
2024-29.8%-26.2%
2025-7.9%-42.2%
2026+2.1%-31.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CXM and VXX good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.34, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CXM and VXX?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CXM and VXX is -0.34 over 3 years, -0.19 over 1 year and -0.35 over 5 years.

Is VXX a good diversifier for CXM?

Yes: at -0.34, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.34 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.34 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cxm-vs-vxx.json

CXM vs VXX: 3-year weekly correlation -0.34CXM vs VXX-0.34

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CXM vs VXX correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cxm-vs-vxx.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cxm-vs-vxx/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CXM correlations · VXX correlations