PairBook
HomeCXM › CXM vs SPT

CXM vs SPT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Sprinklr, Inc. (CXM) and Sprout Social, Inc (SPT) carry a correlation of 0.49, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.49
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.69
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.50
long-run
Ann. covariance
1103.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CXM and SPT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CXM and SPT correlate at 0.49, moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.69) than the 3-year average (0.49). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.50, with an annualized covariance of 1103.0 %².

Among the 13 assets we track against CXM, SPT ranks #5 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with CXM ahead by 21.3 points (-8.3% versus -29.6%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CXM vs SPT: side by side

CXM (Sprinklr, Inc.)SPT (Sprout Social, Inc)
1-year return-8.3%-29.6%
5-year return-49.6%-91.0%
Volatility (ann.)40.4%55.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.911.43
Max drawdown (3Y)-71.1%-92.5%
Market cap$0.7B
P/E (trailing)61.1
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CXM -71.1% vs -92.5%Higher 5y return: CXM -49.6% vs -91.0%
-67%0%+3%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CXM · SPT

Year-by-year returns

YearCXMSPT
2022-48.5%-37.7%
2023+47.4%+8.8%
2024-29.8%-50.0%
2025-7.9%-63.3%
2026+2.1%-2.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CXM and SPT good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.49, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CXM and SPT?

The CXM/SPT correlation stands at 0.49 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.69, 5 years: 0.50), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SPT a good diversifier for CXM?

A fair diversifier. At 0.49, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.49 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cxm-vs-spt.json

CXM vs SPT: 3-year weekly correlation 0.49CXM vs SPT0.49

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CXM vs SPT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cxm-vs-spt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cxm-vs-spt/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CXM correlations · SPT correlations