PairBook
HomeCTM › CTM vs IIPR

CTM vs IIPR: Correlation

How closely do Castellum, Inc. (CTM) and Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.27, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.27
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.10
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.27
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1617.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CTM and IIPR?

Over the past 3 years, CTM and IIPR moved with a correlation of -0.27, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.10) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.27). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.27, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1617.5 %².

Among the 10 assets we track against CTM, IIPR sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #10. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months IIPR outperformed by 55.4 percentage points (-40.4% for CTM against +15.0% for IIPR). Risk is not evenly split, since CTM carries 3.8 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CTM vs IIPR: side by side

CTM (Castellum, Inc.)IIPR (Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.)
1-year return-40.4%+15.0%
5-year returnn/a-63.8%
Volatility (ann.)150.3%39.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.190.85
Max drawdown (3Y)-79.1%-62.9%
Market cap$0.1B$1.6B
P/E (trailing)12.8
Dividend yield0.00%13.32%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: IIPR 13.32% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: IIPR -62.9% vs -79.1%
-44%0%+30%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CTM · IIPR

Year-by-year returns

YearCTMIIPR
2022-59.0%
2023-76.3%+8.8%
2024+571.1%-28.5%
2025-54.9%-18.4%
2026-32.7%+27.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CTM and IIPR good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.27, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CTM and IIPR?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CTM and IIPR is -0.27 over 3 years, 0.10 over 1 year and -0.27 over 5 years.

Is IIPR a good diversifier for CTM?

Yes: at -0.27, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ctm-vs-iipr.json

CTM vs IIPR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.27CTM vs IIPR-0.27

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CTM vs IIPR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ctm-vs-iipr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ctm-vs-iipr/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CTM correlations · IIPR correlations