PairBook
HomeCTM › CTM vs HSIC

CTM vs HSIC: Correlation

Castellum, Inc. (CTM) and Henry Schein (HSIC) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.25.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.09
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.23
long-run
Ann. covariance
-940.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CTM and HSIC?

Over the past 3 years, CTM and HSIC moved with a correlation of -0.25, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.09) than the 3-year average (-0.25). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.23, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -940.3 %².

HSIC is close to the least connected end of CTM's tracked universe, ranking #8 of 10. The last year tells two different stories: HSIC led by 71.3 percentage points, -40.4% for CTM against +30.9% for HSIC. Note the risk asymmetry: CTM runs 6.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CTM vs HSIC: side by side

CTM (Castellum, Inc.)HSIC (Henry Schein)
1-year return-40.4%+30.9%
5-year returnn/a+20.1%
Volatility (ann.)150.3%25.2%
Beta vs S&P 5001.190.33
Max drawdown (3Y)-79.1%-24.3%
Market cap$0.1B$10.1B
P/E (trailing)26.3
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedHealth Care
Smaller drawdown: HSIC -24.3% vs -79.1%
-44%0%+30%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CTM · HSIC

Year-by-year returns

YearCTMHSIC
2022+3.0%
2023-76.3%-5.2%
2024+571.1%-8.6%
2025-54.9%+9.2%
2026-32.7%+19.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CTM and HSIC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, CTM and HSIC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CTM and HSIC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CTM and HSIC is -0.25 over 3 years, 0.09 over 1 year and -0.23 over 5 years.

Is HSIC a good diversifier for CTM?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, CTM and HSIC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ctm-vs-hsic.json

CTM vs HSIC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25CTM vs HSIC-0.25

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CTM vs HSIC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ctm-vs-hsic.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ctm-vs-hsic/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CTM correlations · HSIC correlations