PairBook
HomeCTM › CTM vs FNUC

CTM vs FNUC: Correlation

How closely do Castellum, Inc. (CTM) and Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Inc. (FNUC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.60, which is strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.60
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.28
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.54
long-run
Ann. covariance
21325.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CTM and FNUC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CTM and FNUC correlate at 0.60, strong. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.28) runs below the 3-year figure (0.60). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.54, with an annualized covariance of 21325.4 %².

Few assets follow CTM as closely as FNUC, which ranks #1 of 10 tracked partners. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CTM outperformed by 18.7 percentage points (-40.4% for CTM against -59.1% for FNUC). Risk is not evenly split, since FNUC carries 1.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CTM vs FNUC: side by side

CTM (Castellum, Inc.)FNUC (Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Inc.)
1-year return-40.4%-59.1%
5-year returnn/a-99.0%
Volatility (ann.)150.3%237.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.191.55
Max drawdown (3Y)-79.1%-94.2%
Market cap$0.1B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CTM -79.1% vs -94.2%
-59%0%+31%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CTM · FNUC

Year-by-year returns

YearCTMFNUC
2022-60.4%
2023-76.3%-48.7%
2024+571.1%-17.9%
2025-54.9%-76.0%
2026-32.7%-43.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CTM and FNUC good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.60 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CTM and FNUC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CTM and FNUC is 0.60 over 3 years, 0.28 over 1 year and 0.54 over 5 years.

Is FNUC a good diversifier for CTM?

To a limited degree. At 0.60 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.60 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.60 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ctm-vs-fnuc.json

CTM vs FNUC: 3-year weekly correlation 0.60CTM vs FNUC0.60

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CTM vs FNUC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ctm-vs-fnuc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ctm-vs-fnuc/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CTM correlations · FNUC correlations