CNS vs SFBS: Correlation
How closely do Cohen & Steers Inc (CNS) and ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.65, which is strong.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CNS and SFBS?
Over the past 3 years, CNS and SFBS moved with a correlation of 0.65, which is strong. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.30) runs below the 3-year figure (0.65). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.55, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 676.5 %².
By 3-year correlation, SFBS places #5 of the 13 assets tracked against CNS. Over the last 12 months CNS came out ahead by 14.5 percentage points (+13.7% against -0.8%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CNS vs SFBS: side by side
| CNS (Cohen & Steers Inc) | SFBS (ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +13.7% | -0.8% |
| 5-year return | +11.8% | +29.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 30.4% | 34.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.83 | 0.96 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -42.6% | -30.4% |
| Market cap | $4.2B | $4.7B |
| P/E (trailing) | 25.7 | 14.7 |
| Dividend yield | 3.10% | 1.70% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CNS | SFBS |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -28.0% | -17.9% |
| 2023 | +21.8% | -1.2% |
| 2024 | +25.5% | +28.8% |
| 2025 | -29.8% | -13.9% |
| 2026 | +35.3% | +22.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CNS and SFBS good diversifiers for each other?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.65 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CNS and SFBS?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CNS and SFBS is 0.65 over 3 years, 0.30 over 1 year and 0.55 over 5 years.
Is SFBS a good diversifier for CNS?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.65 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
What does a correlation of 0.65 mean?
A reading of 0.65 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cns-vs-sfbs.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cns-vs-sfbs/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CNS correlations · SFBS correlations
