PairBook
HomeAPAM › APAM vs CNS

APAM vs CNS: Correlation

Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. (APAM) and Cohen & Steers Inc (CNS) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.69.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.69
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.37
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.70
long-run
Ann. covariance
564.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are APAM and CNS?

On 3 years of weekly data the APAM/CNS correlation comes out at 0.69, strong. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.37) than the 3-year average (0.69). The 5-year figure is 0.70, and annualized covariance runs at 564.3 %².

Among the 17 assets we track against APAM, CNS ranks #6 by 3-year correlation. Over the last 12 months CNS came out ahead by 12.5 percentage points (+1.2% against +13.7%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

APAM vs CNS: side by side

APAM (Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc.)CNS (Cohen & Steers Inc)
1-year return+1.2%+13.7%
5-year return+28.1%+11.8%
Volatility (ann.)27.0%30.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.140.83
Max drawdown (3Y)-28.9%-42.6%
Market cap$3.1B$4.2B
P/E (trailing)10.425.7
Dividend yield7.95%3.10%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: APAM 10.4 vs 25.7Higher yield: APAM 7.95% vs 3.10%Smaller drawdown: APAM -28.9% vs -42.6%Higher 5y return: APAM +28.1% vs +11.8%
-20%0%+21%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. APAM · CNS

Year-by-year returns

YearAPAMCNS
2022-31.3%-28.0%
2023+60.3%+21.8%
2024+4.8%+25.5%
2025+2.7%-29.8%
2026+15.4%+35.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are APAM and CNS good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.69 means APAM and CNS share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between APAM and CNS?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.69 over 3 years, with 0.37 over the last year and 0.70 over 5 years.

Is CNS a good diversifier for APAM?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.69 means APAM and CNS share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.69 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/apam-vs-cns.json

APAM vs CNS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.69APAM vs CNS0.69

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![APAM vs CNS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/apam-vs-cns.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/apam-vs-cns/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: APAM correlations · CNS correlations