CNS vs OMH: Correlation
Cohen & Steers Inc (CNS) and Ohmyhome Limited - Class A (OMH) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.23.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CNS and OMH?
On 3 years of weekly data the CNS/OMH correlation comes out at -0.23, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.15 over 1 year against -0.23 over 3. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -3122.9 %².
OMH is close to the least connected end of CNS's tracked universe, ranking #11 of 13. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with CNS ahead by 107.3 points (+13.7% versus -93.6%). One caveat on sizing: OMH is 14.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CNS vs OMH: side by side
| CNS (Cohen & Steers Inc) | OMH (Ohmyhome Limited - Class A) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +13.7% | -93.6% |
| 5-year return | +11.8% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 30.4% | 448.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.83 | -3.85 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -42.6% | -97.9% |
| Market cap | $4.2B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 25.7 | – |
| Dividend yield | 3.10% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CNS | OMH |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -28.0% | – |
| 2023 | +21.8% | – |
| 2024 | +25.5% | -73.9% |
| 2025 | -29.8% | +102.0% |
| 2026 | +35.3% | -90.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CNS and OMH good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CNS and OMH?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.23 over 3 years, with -0.15 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.
Is OMH a good diversifier for CNS?
Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.23 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cns-vs-omh.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cns-vs-omh/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CNS correlations · OMH correlations
