PairBook
HomeCMCL › CMCL vs SPWH

CMCL vs SPWH: Correlation

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) and Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.32.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.32
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.23
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.25
long-run
Ann. covariance
1389.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CMCL and SPWH?

Over the past 3 years, CMCL and SPWH moved with a correlation of 0.32, which is moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.23) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.25, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 1389.4 %².

Among the 13 assets we track against CMCL, SPWH ranks #7 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CMCL outperformed by 63.5 percentage points (+5.4% for CMCL against -58.1% for SPWH). Risk is not evenly split, since SPWH carries 1.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CMCL vs SPWH: side by side

CMCL (Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc)SPWH (Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return+5.4%-58.1%
5-year return+156.5%-93.6%
Volatility (ann.)52.7%83.1%
Beta vs S&P 5001.100.37
Max drawdown (3Y)-55.2%-82.6%
Market cap$0.5B
P/E (trailing)7.3
Dividend yield2.25%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: CMCL 2.25% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CMCL -55.2% vs -82.6%Higher 5y return: CMCL +156.5% vs -93.6%
-67%0%+30%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CMCL · SPWH

Year-by-year returns

YearCMCLSPWH
2022+11.4%-20.3%
2023+2.6%-54.7%
2024-18.9%-37.3%
2025+183.7%-45.3%
2026-1.4%-21.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CMCL and SPWH good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.32, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CMCL and SPWH?

The CMCL/SPWH correlation stands at 0.32 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.23, 5 years: 0.25), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SPWH a good diversifier for CMCL?

A fair diversifier. At 0.32, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.32 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.32 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cmcl-vs-spwh.json

CMCL vs SPWH: 3-year weekly correlation 0.32CMCL vs SPWH0.32

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CMCL vs SPWH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cmcl-vs-spwh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cmcl-vs-spwh/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CMCL correlations · SPWH correlations