PairBook
HomeCMCL › CMCL vs GGN

CMCL vs GGN: Correlation

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) and GAMCO Global Gold, Natural Resources & Income Trust (GGN) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.69.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.69
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.79
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.62
long-run
Ann. covariance
670.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CMCL and GGN?

Over the past 3 years, CMCL and GGN moved with a correlation of 0.69, which is strong. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.79 versus 0.69 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.62, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 670.4 %².

Among the 13 assets we track against CMCL, GGN ranks #4 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with GGN ahead by 23.2 points (+5.4% versus +28.6%). One caveat on sizing: CMCL is 2.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CMCL vs GGN: side by side

CMCL (Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc)GGN (GAMCO Global Gold, Natural Resources & Income Trust)
1-year return+5.4%+28.6%
5-year return+156.5%+128.2%
Volatility (ann.)52.7%18.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.100.36
Max drawdown (3Y)-55.2%-16.9%
Market cap$0.5B
P/E (trailing)7.32.8
Dividend yield2.25%6.36%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: GGN 2.8 vs 7.3Higher yield: GGN 6.36% vs 2.25%Smaller drawdown: GGN -16.9% vs -55.2%Higher 5y return: CMCL +156.5% vs +128.2%
-40%0%+30%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CMCL · GGN

Year-by-year returns

YearCMCLGGN
2022+11.4%+6.8%
2023+2.6%+14.1%
2024-18.9%+9.6%
2025+183.7%+48.2%
2026-1.4%+15.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CMCL and GGN good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.69 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CMCL and GGN?

The CMCL/GGN correlation stands at 0.69 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.79, 5 years: 0.62), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is GGN a good diversifier for CMCL?

To a limited degree. At 0.69 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.69 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.69 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cmcl-vs-ggn.json

CMCL vs GGN: 3-year weekly correlation 0.69CMCL vs GGN0.69

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CMCL vs GGN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cmcl-vs-ggn.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cmcl-vs-ggn/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CMCL correlations · GGN correlations