PairBook
HomeCMCL › CMCL vs PULM

CMCL vs PULM: Correlation

How closely do Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) and Pulmatrix, Inc. (PULM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.25, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.02
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.16
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1942.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CMCL and PULM?

On 3 years of weekly data the CMCL/PULM correlation comes out at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.02) than the 3-year average (-0.25). The 5-year figure is -0.16, and annualized covariance runs at -1942.8 %².

Among the 13 assets we track against CMCL, PULM sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #12. The last year tells two different stories: CMCL led by 74.1 percentage points, +5.4% for CMCL against -68.7% for PULM. One caveat on sizing: PULM is 2.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CMCL vs PULM: side by side

CMCL (Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc)PULM (Pulmatrix, Inc.)
1-year return+5.4%-68.7%
5-year return+156.5%-90.6%
Volatility (ann.)52.7%144.8%
Beta vs S&P 5001.10-0.18
Max drawdown (3Y)-55.2%-88.1%
Market cap$0.5B
P/E (trailing)7.3
Dividend yield2.25%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: CMCL 2.25% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CMCL -55.2% vs -88.1%Higher 5y return: CMCL +156.5% vs -90.6%
-75%0%+30%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CMCL · PULM

Year-by-year returns

YearCMCLPULM
2022+11.4%-55.7%
2023+2.6%-52.1%
2024-18.9%+275.3%
2025+183.7%-68.1%
2026-1.4%-31.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CMCL and PULM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CMCL and PULM?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.25 over 3 years, with -0.02 over the last year and -0.16 over 5 years.

Is PULM a good diversifier for CMCL?

Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.25 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cmcl-vs-pulm.json

CMCL vs PULM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25CMCL vs PULM-0.25

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CMCL vs PULM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cmcl-vs-pulm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cmcl-vs-pulm/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CMCL correlations · PULM correlations