PairBook
HomeCMCL › CMCL vs QQQ

CMCL vs QQQ: Correlation

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) and Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) show a weak relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.26.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.26
weak
Correlation (1Y)
0.35
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.27
long-run
Ann. covariance
267.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CMCL and QQQ?

Over the past 3 years, CMCL and QQQ moved with a correlation of 0.26, which is weak. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.35 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.27, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 267.1 %².

QQQ is close to the least connected end of CMCL's tracked universe, ranking #10 of 13. The last year tells two different stories: QQQ led by 20.9 percentage points, +5.4% for CMCL against +26.3% for QQQ. One caveat on sizing: CMCL is 2.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CMCL vs QQQ: side by side

CMCL (Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc)QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust)
1-year return+5.4%+26.3%
5-year return+156.5%+95.4%
Volatility (ann.)52.7%19.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.101.28
Max drawdown (3Y)-55.2%-22.8%
Market cap$0.5B
P/E (trailing)7.3
Dividend yield2.25%0.44%
Expense ratio0.18%
Assets under management$452.8B
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · US Growth & Tech
Higher yield: CMCL 2.25% vs 0.44%Smaller drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs -55.2%Higher 5y return: CMCL +156.5% vs +95.4%

QQQ is a Large Growth fund from Invesco: $452.8B under management, 104 holdings, a 0.18% expense ratio, a 0.44% trailing dividend yield.

-40%0%+30%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CMCL · QQQ

Year-by-year returns

YearCMCLQQQ
2022+11.4%-32.6%
2023+2.6%+54.9%
2024-18.9%+25.6%
2025+183.7%+20.8%
2026-1.4%+17.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CMCL and QQQ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.26 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CMCL and QQQ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.26 over 3 years, with 0.35 over the last year and 0.27 over 5 years.

Is QQQ a good diversifier for CMCL?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.26 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.26 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.26 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cmcl-vs-qqq.json

CMCL vs QQQ: 3-year weekly correlation 0.26CMCL vs QQQ0.26

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CMCL vs QQQ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cmcl-vs-qqq.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cmcl-vs-qqq/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CMCL correlations · QQQ correlations