CLVT vs MTCH: Correlation
How closely do Clarivate Plc (CLVT) and Match Group, Inc. (MTCH) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.39, which is moderate.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CLVT and MTCH?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CLVT and MTCH correlate at 0.39, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.38 over 1 year against 0.39 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.41, with an annualized covariance of 741.1 %².
Within CLVT's tracked universe of 13 assets, MTCH comes in at #7 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MTCH outperformed by 67.3 percentage points (-54.7% for CLVT against +12.6% for MTCH). One caveat on sizing: CLVT is 1.9 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CLVT vs MTCH: side by side
| CLVT (Clarivate Plc) | MTCH (Match Group, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -54.7% | +12.6% |
| 5-year return | -91.9% | -69.2% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 59.3% | 32.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.99 | 0.49 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -82.2% | -41.6% |
| Market cap | $1.3B | $9.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 14.9 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.85% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CLVT | MTCH |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -64.5% | -68.6% |
| 2023 | +11.0% | -12.0% |
| 2024 | -45.1% | -10.4% |
| 2025 | -34.3% | +1.0% |
| 2026 | -39.2% | +29.9% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CLVT and MTCH good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.39, CLVT and MTCH keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CLVT and MTCH?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.39 over 3 years, with 0.38 over the last year and 0.41 over 5 years.
Is MTCH a good diversifier for CLVT?
Reasonably. At 0.39, CLVT and MTCH keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.39 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.39 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/clvt-vs-mtch.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/clvt-vs-mtch/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CLVT correlations · MTCH correlations
