CLVT vs VRSK: Correlation
Clarivate Plc (CLVT) and Verisk Analytics (VRSK) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.48.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CLVT and VRSK?
On 3 years of weekly data the CLVT/VRSK correlation comes out at 0.48, moderate. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.66) runs above the 3-year figure (0.48). The 5-year figure is 0.44, and annualized covariance runs at 719.0 %².
By 3-year correlation, VRSK places #5 of the 13 assets tracked against CLVT. The last year tells two different stories: VRSK led by 26.7 percentage points, -54.7% for CLVT against -28.0% for VRSK. Note the risk asymmetry: CLVT runs 2.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CLVT vs VRSK: side by side
| CLVT (Clarivate Plc) | VRSK (Verisk Analytics) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -54.7% | -28.0% |
| 5-year return | -91.9% | -1.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 59.3% | 25.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.99 | 0.27 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -82.2% | -50.8% |
| Market cap | $1.3B | $24.9B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 28.8 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.01% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Industrials |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CLVT | VRSK |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -64.5% | -22.3% |
| 2023 | +11.0% | +36.2% |
| 2024 | -45.1% | +16.0% |
| 2025 | -34.3% | -18.2% |
| 2026 | -39.2% | -14.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CLVT and VRSK good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.48 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CLVT and VRSK?
The CLVT/VRSK correlation stands at 0.48 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.66, 5 years: 0.44), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is VRSK a good diversifier for CLVT?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.48 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.48 mean?
A reading of 0.48 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/clvt-vs-vrsk.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/clvt-vs-vrsk/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CLVT correlations · VRSK correlations
