PairBook
HomeACMR › ACMR vs CLVT

ACMR vs CLVT: Correlation

How closely do ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) and Clarivate Plc (CLVT) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.22, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.36
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.08
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1064.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ACMR and CLVT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ACMR and CLVT correlate at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.36) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.22). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.08, with an annualized covariance of -1064.2 %².

CLVT is close to the least connected end of ACMR's tracked universe, ranking #9 of 13. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ACMR outperformed by 236.3 percentage points (+181.6% for ACMR against -54.7% for CLVT).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ACMR vs CLVT: side by side

ACMR (ACM Research, Inc.)CLVT (Clarivate Plc)
1-year return+181.6%-54.7%
5-year return+173.8%-91.9%
Volatility (ann.)80.8%59.3%
Beta vs S&P 5002.070.99
Max drawdown (3Y)-58.4%-82.2%
Market cap$5.6B$1.3B
P/E (trailing)37.3
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: ACMR -58.4% vs -82.2%Higher 5y return: ACMR +173.8% vs -91.9%
-60%0%+301%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ACMR · CLVT

Year-by-year returns

YearACMRCLVT
2022-72.9%-64.5%
2023+153.4%+11.0%
2024-22.7%-45.1%
2025+161.3%-34.3%
2026+104.0%-39.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ACMR and CLVT good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ACMR and CLVT?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ACMR and CLVT is -0.22 over 3 years, -0.36 over 1 year and -0.08 over 5 years.

Is CLVT a good diversifier for ACMR?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/acmr-vs-clvt.json

ACMR vs CLVT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22ACMR vs CLVT-0.22

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ACMR vs CLVT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/acmr-vs-clvt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/acmr-vs-clvt/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ACMR correlations · CLVT correlations