PairBook
HomeCL › CL vs SOC

CL vs SOC: Correlation

Colgate-Palmolive (CL) and Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.44
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.18
long-run
Ann. covariance
-407.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CL and SOC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CL and SOC correlate at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.44 versus -0.24 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.18, with an annualized covariance of -407.0 %².

Among the 40 assets we track against CL, SOC sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #36. The last year tells two different stories: CL led by 94.0 percentage points, +10.4% for CL against -83.6% for SOC. Note the risk asymmetry: SOC runs 6.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CL vs SOC: side by side

CL (Colgate-Palmolive)SOC (Sable Offshore Corp.)
1-year return+10.4%-83.6%
5-year return+32.0%-51.7%
Volatility (ann.)16.9%101.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.170.03
Max drawdown (3Y)-29.0%-90.7%
Market cap$72.5B$0.9B
P/E (trailing)36.2
Dividend yield2.27%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesUS Listed
Higher yield: CL 2.27% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CL -29.0% vs -90.7%Higher 5y return: CL +32.0% vs -51.7%
-83%0%+18%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CL · SOC

Year-by-year returns

YearCLSOC
2022-5.4%+3.4%
2023+3.8%+13.3%
2024+16.6%+101.1%
2025-11.0%-60.6%
2026+17.2%-48.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CL and SOC good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CL and SOC?

The CL/SOC correlation stands at -0.24 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.44, 5 years: -0.18), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SOC a good diversifier for CL?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.24 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cl-vs-soc.json

CL vs SOC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24CL vs SOC-0.24

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CL vs SOC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cl-vs-soc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cl-vs-soc/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CL correlations · SOC correlations