PairBook
HomeCL › CL vs NCSM

CL vs NCSM: Correlation

How closely do Colgate-Palmolive (CL) and NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.24, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.40
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.13
long-run
Ann. covariance
-269.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CL and NCSM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CL and NCSM correlate at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.40) than the 3-year average (-0.24). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.13, with an annualized covariance of -269.2 %².

Among the 40 assets we track against CL, NCSM ranks #35 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months NCSM outperformed by 24.1 percentage points (+10.4% for CL against +34.5% for NCSM). One caveat on sizing: NCSM is 3.9 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CL vs NCSM: side by side

CL (Colgate-Palmolive)NCSM (NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return+10.4%+34.5%
5-year return+32.0%+112.6%
Volatility (ann.)16.9%66.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.170.05
Max drawdown (3Y)-29.0%-53.3%
Market cap$72.5B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)36.29.7
Dividend yield2.27%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesUS Listed
Lower P/E: NCSM 9.7 vs 36.2Higher yield: CL 2.27% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CL -29.0% vs -53.3%Higher 5y return: NCSM +112.6% vs +32.0%
-17%0%+81%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CL · NCSM

Year-by-year returns

YearCLNCSM
2022-5.4%-13.8%
2023+3.8%-28.6%
2024+16.6%+45.4%
2025-11.0%+52.1%
2026+17.2%+28.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CL and NCSM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, CL and NCSM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CL and NCSM?

The CL/NCSM correlation stands at -0.24 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.40, 5 years: -0.13), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is NCSM a good diversifier for CL?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, CL and NCSM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.24 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cl-vs-ncsm.json

CL vs NCSM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24CL vs NCSM-0.24

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CL vs NCSM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cl-vs-ncsm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cl-vs-ncsm/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CL correlations · NCSM correlations