PairBook
HomeCL › CL vs KMB

CL vs KMB: Correlation

How closely do Colgate-Palmolive (CL) and Kimberly-Clark (KMB) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.53, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.53
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.34
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.63
long-run
Ann. covariance
173.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CL and KMB?

Over the past 3 years, CL and KMB moved with a correlation of 0.53, which is moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.34) runs below the 3-year figure (0.53). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.63, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 173.3 %².

By 3-year correlation, KMB places #8 of the 40 assets tracked against CL. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with CL ahead by 21.8 points (+10.4% versus -11.4%). This link changes with the market regime, having swung between 0.31 and 0.83 on a rolling one-year basis.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CL vs KMB: side by side

CL (Colgate-Palmolive)KMB (Kimberly-Clark)
1-year return+10.4%-11.4%
5-year return+32.0%-2.6%
Volatility (ann.)16.9%19.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.170.15
Max drawdown (3Y)-29.0%-34.1%
Market cap$72.5B$36.6B
P/E (trailing)36.221.7
Dividend yield2.27%4.60%
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
Lower P/E: KMB 21.7 vs 36.2Higher yield: KMB 4.60% vs 2.27%Smaller drawdown: CL -29.0% vs -34.1%Higher 5y return: CL +32.0% vs -2.6%
-24%0%+18%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CL · KMB

Year-by-year returns

YearCLKMB
2022-5.4%-1.6%
2023+3.8%-7.1%
2024+16.6%+11.8%
2025-11.0%-19.9%
2026+17.2%+11.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CL and KMB good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.53 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CL and KMB?

The CL/KMB correlation stands at 0.53 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.34, 5 years: 0.63), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is KMB a good diversifier for CL?

To a limited degree. At 0.53 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.53 mean?

A reading of 0.53 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cl-vs-kmb.json

CL vs KMB: 3-year weekly correlation 0.53CL vs KMB0.53

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CL vs KMB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cl-vs-kmb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cl-vs-kmb/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CL correlations · KMB correlations