CL vs GEOS: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Colgate-Palmolive (CL) and Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) carry a correlation of -0.25, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CL and GEOS?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CL and GEOS correlate at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.35 over 1 year against -0.25 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.17, with an annualized covariance of -362.9 %².
GEOS is close to the least connected end of CL's tracked universe, ranking #37 of 40. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CL outperformed by 84.6 percentage points (+10.4% for CL against -74.2% for GEOS). Risk is not evenly split, since GEOS carries 5.1 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CL vs GEOS: side by side
| CL (Colgate-Palmolive) | GEOS (Geospace Technologies Corporation) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +10.4% | -74.2% |
| 5-year return | +32.0% | -48.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 16.9% | 86.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.17 | 0.66 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -29.0% | -81.9% |
| Market cap | $72.5B | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | 36.2 | – |
| Dividend yield | 2.27% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Consumer Staples | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CL | GEOS |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -5.4% | -36.9% |
| 2023 | +3.8% | +207.1% |
| 2024 | +16.6% | -22.7% |
| 2025 | -11.0% | +68.8% |
| 2026 | +17.2% | -69.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CL and GEOS good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CL and GEOS?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CL and GEOS is -0.25 over 3 years, -0.35 over 1 year and -0.17 over 5 years.
Is GEOS a good diversifier for CL?
Yes: at -0.25, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.25 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cl-vs-geos.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cl-vs-geos/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CL correlations · GEOS correlations
