PairBook
HomeCISS › CISS vs HUBG

CISS vs HUBG: Correlation

C3is Inc. (CISS) and Hub Group, Inc. (HUBG) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.28.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.28
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.40
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-20118.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CISS and HUBG?

Over the past 3 years, CISS and HUBG moved with a correlation of -0.28, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.40 versus -0.28 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -20118.1 %².

Within CISS's tracked universe of 42 assets, HUBG comes in at #32 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with HUBG ahead by 109.6 points (-99.5% versus +10.1%). Risk is not evenly split, since CISS carries 61.4 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CISS vs HUBG: side by side

CISS (C3is Inc.)HUBG (Hub Group, Inc.)
1-year return-99.5%+10.1%
5-year returnn/a+17.3%
Volatility (ann.)2098.5%34.2%
Beta vs S&P 5002.241.10
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-40.8%
Market cap$2.4B
P/E (trailing)23.0
Dividend yield0.00%1.25%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: HUBG 1.25% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: HUBG -40.8% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+39%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CISS · HUBG

Year-by-year returns

YearCISSHUBG
2022-5.6%
2023+15.7%
2024-98.9%-2.0%
2025-97.3%-3.1%
2026-93.4%-5.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CISS and HUBG good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.28, CISS and HUBG have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CISS and HUBG?

The CISS/HUBG correlation stands at -0.28 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.40, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is HUBG a good diversifier for CISS?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.28, CISS and HUBG have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.28 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ciss-vs-hubg.json

CISS vs HUBG: 3-year weekly correlation -0.28CISS vs HUBG-0.28

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CISS vs HUBG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ciss-vs-hubg.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ciss-vs-hubg/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CISS correlations · HUBG correlations