PairBook
HomeACH › ACH vs CISS

ACH vs CISS: Correlation

Accendra Health, Inc. (ACH) and C3is Inc. (CISS) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.41.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.41
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.60
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-77091.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ACH and CISS?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ACH and CISS correlate at -0.41, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.60) than the 3-year average (-0.41). Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -77091.9 %².

CISS is close to the least connected end of ACH's tracked universe, ranking #15 of 16. The last year tells two different stories: ACH led by 24.2 percentage points, -75.3% for ACH against -99.5% for CISS. Note the risk asymmetry: CISS runs 23.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ACH vs CISS: side by side

ACH (Accendra Health, Inc.)CISS (C3is Inc.)
1-year return-75.3%-99.5%
5-year return-96.8%n/a
Volatility (ann.)89.1%2098.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.372.24
Max drawdown (3Y)-96.6%-100.0%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: ACH -96.6% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+10%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ACH · CISS

Year-by-year returns

YearACHCISS
2022-55.1%
2023-1.3%
2024-32.2%-98.9%
2025-78.6%-97.3%
2026-56.8%-93.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ACH and CISS good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.41, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ACH and CISS?

The ACH/CISS correlation stands at -0.41 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.60, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is CISS a good diversifier for ACH?

Yes: at -0.41, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.41 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ach-vs-ciss.json

ACH vs CISS: 3-year weekly correlation -0.41ACH vs CISS-0.41

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ACH vs CISS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ach-vs-ciss.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ach-vs-ciss/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ACH correlations · CISS correlations