PairBook
HomeCISS › CISS vs MNST

CISS vs MNST: Correlation

C3is Inc. (CISS) and Monster Beverage (MNST) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.51.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.51
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.54
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-73557.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CISS and MNST?

On 3 years of weekly data the CISS/MNST correlation comes out at -0.51, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.54) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -73557.1 %².

Among the 42 assets we track against CISS, MNST sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #42. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MNST ahead by 75.2 points (-99.5% versus -24.3%). Note the risk asymmetry: CISS runs 30.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CISS vs MNST: side by side

CISS (C3is Inc.)MNST (Monster Beverage)
1-year return-99.5%-24.3%
5-year returnn/a-4.5%
Volatility (ann.)2098.5%68.6%
Beta vs S&P 5002.240.80
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-54.5%
Market cap$91.5B
P/E (trailing)43.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Smaller drawdown: MNST -54.5% vs -100.0%
-100%0%+56%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CISS · MNST

Year-by-year returns

YearCISSMNST
2022+5.7%
2023+13.5%
2024-98.9%-8.8%
2025-97.3%+45.9%
2026-93.4%-39.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CISS and MNST good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.51, CISS and MNST have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CISS and MNST?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.51 over 3 years, with -0.54 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is MNST a good diversifier for CISS?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.51, CISS and MNST have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.51 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ciss-vs-mnst.json

CISS vs MNST: 3-year weekly correlation -0.51CISS vs MNST-0.51

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CISS vs MNST correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ciss-vs-mnst.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ciss-vs-mnst/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CISS correlations · MNST correlations