CIK vs GNSS: Correlation
How closely do Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund, Inc. (CIK) and Genasys Inc. (GNSS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.39, which is moderate.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CIK and GNSS?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CIK and GNSS correlate at 0.39, moderate. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.54 versus 0.39 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.26, with an annualized covariance of 277.6 %².
Among the 11 assets we track against CIK, GNSS sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #8. The trailing year gives CIK the advantage: -9.3% versus -19.3%, a 10.0-point spread. Risk is not evenly split, since GNSS carries 5.3 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CIK vs GNSS: side by side
| CIK (Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund, Inc.) | GNSS (Genasys Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -9.3% | -19.3% |
| 5-year return | +11.7% | -71.2% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 11.5% | 61.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.50 | 1.53 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -15.4% | -63.2% |
| Market cap | – | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | 17.4 | – |
| Dividend yield | 11.11% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CIK | GNSS |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -19.0% | -7.0% |
| 2023 | +37.1% | -45.1% |
| 2024 | +1.2% | +28.1% |
| 2025 | +7.8% | -17.3% |
| 2026 | -8.1% | -27.9% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CIK and GNSS good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.39, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CIK and GNSS?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CIK and GNSS is 0.39 over 3 years, 0.54 over 1 year and 0.26 over 5 years.
Is GNSS a good diversifier for CIK?
A fair diversifier. At 0.39, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.39 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cik-vs-gnss.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cik-vs-gnss/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CIK correlations · GNSS correlations
