PairBook
HomeCIK › CIK vs VLT

CIK vs VLT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund, Inc. (CIK) and Invesco High Income Trust II (VLT) carry a correlation of 0.70, a strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.70
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.75
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.74
long-run
Ann. covariance
81.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CIK and VLT?

On 3 years of weekly data the CIK/VLT correlation comes out at 0.70, strong. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.75 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.74, and annualized covariance runs at 81.2 %².

VLT is one of the assets that tracks CIK most closely: it ranks #1 out of the 11 assets we track against CIK. On 12-month performance VLT holds a 8.0-point edge, -9.3% against -1.3%.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CIK vs VLT: side by side

CIK (Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund, Inc.)VLT (Invesco High Income Trust II)
1-year return-9.3%-1.3%
5-year return+11.7%+12.4%
Volatility (ann.)11.5%10.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.500.47
Max drawdown (3Y)-15.4%-13.4%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)17.413.9
Dividend yield11.11%11.52%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: VLT 13.9 vs 17.4Higher yield: VLT 11.52% vs 11.11%Smaller drawdown: VLT -13.4% vs -15.4%Higher 5y return: VLT +12.4% vs +11.7%
-13%0%+4%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CIK · VLT

Year-by-year returns

YearCIKVLT
2022-19.0%-20.9%
2023+37.1%+13.1%
2024+1.2%+17.3%
2025+7.8%+13.2%
2026-8.1%-4.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CIK and VLT good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.70 means CIK and VLT share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CIK and VLT?

The CIK/VLT correlation stands at 0.70 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.75, 5 years: 0.74), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is VLT a good diversifier for CIK?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.70 means CIK and VLT share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.70 mean?

A reading of 0.70 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cik-vs-vlt.json

CIK vs VLT: 3-year weekly correlation 0.70CIK vs VLT0.70

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CIK vs VLT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cik-vs-vlt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cik-vs-vlt/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CIK correlations · VLT correlations