BLW vs CIK: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Blackrock Limited Duration Income Trust (BLW) and Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund, Inc. (CIK) carry a correlation of 0.66, a strong link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BLW and CIK?
Over the past 3 years, BLW and CIK moved with a correlation of 0.66, which is strong. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.72) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.64, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 74.9 %².
By 3-year correlation, CIK places #9 of the 17 assets tracked against BLW. On 12-month performance BLW holds a 9.1-point edge, -0.2% against -9.3%.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BLW vs CIK: side by side
| BLW (Blackrock Limited Duration Income Trust) | CIK (Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -0.2% | -9.3% |
| 5-year return | +16.7% | +11.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 9.8% | 11.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.38 | 0.50 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -11.2% | -15.4% |
| Market cap | $0.5B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 10.4 | 17.4 |
| Dividend yield | 10.69% | 11.11% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BLW | CIK |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -15.9% | -19.0% |
| 2023 | +17.3% | +37.1% |
| 2024 | +11.1% | +1.2% |
| 2025 | +7.1% | +7.8% |
| 2026 | -0.8% | -8.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BLW and CIK good diversifiers for each other?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.66 means BLW and CIK share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BLW and CIK?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BLW and CIK is 0.66 over 3 years, 0.72 over 1 year and 0.64 over 5 years.
Is CIK a good diversifier for BLW?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.66 means BLW and CIK share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
What does a correlation of 0.66 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/blw-vs-cik.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/blw-vs-cik/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BLW correlations · CIK correlations
