PairBook
HomeCI › CI vs LOMA

CI vs LOMA: Correlation

How closely do Cigna (CI) and Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima (LOMA) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.23, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.43
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.10
long-run
Ann. covariance
-292.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CI and LOMA?

Over the past 3 years, CI and LOMA moved with a correlation of -0.23, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.43) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.23). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.10, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -292.7 %².

By 3-year correlation, LOMA places #25 of the 30 assets tracked against CI. Over the last 12 months LOMA came out ahead by 8.4 percentage points (-5.4% against +3.0%). Note the risk asymmetry: LOMA runs 1.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CI vs LOMA: side by side

CI (Cigna)LOMA (Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anonima)
1-year return-5.4%+3.0%
5-year return+46.7%+76.0%
Volatility (ann.)26.7%47.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.220.64
Max drawdown (3Y)-32.1%-48.3%
Market cap$73.4B$1.1B
P/E (trailing)11.638.7
Dividend yield2.19%0.00%
Sector / categoryHealth CareUS Listed
Lower P/E: CI 11.6 vs 38.7Higher yield: CI 2.19% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CI -32.1% vs -48.3%Higher 5y return: LOMA +76.0% vs +46.7%
-20%0%+44%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). CI · LOMA

Year-by-year returns

YearCILOMA
2022+46.7%+26.6%
2023-8.0%+21.0%
2024-6.3%+68.4%
2025+1.7%+8.5%
2026+2.0%-25.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CI and LOMA good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CI and LOMA?

The CI/LOMA correlation stands at -0.23 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.43, 5 years: -0.10), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is LOMA a good diversifier for CI?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ci-vs-loma.json

CI vs LOMA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23CI vs LOMA-0.23

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CI vs LOMA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ci-vs-loma.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ci-vs-loma/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CI correlations · LOMA correlations