CI vs INTS: Correlation
How closely do Cigna (CI) and Intensity Therapeutics, Inc. (INTS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.30, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CI and INTS?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CI and INTS correlate at -0.30, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.65 versus -0.30 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -1370.8 %².
Out of 30 assets tracked against CI, INTS lands near the bottom at #30. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CI outperformed by 38.0 percentage points (-5.4% for CI against -43.4% for INTS). Note the risk asymmetry: INTS runs 6.5 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CI vs INTS: side by side
| CI (Cigna) | INTS (Intensity Therapeutics, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -5.4% | -43.4% |
| 5-year return | +46.7% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 26.7% | 173.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.22 | 0.52 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -32.1% | -98.5% |
| Market cap | $73.4B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 11.6 | – |
| Dividend yield | 2.19% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | Health Care | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CI | INTS |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +46.7% | – |
| 2023 | -8.0% | – |
| 2024 | -6.3% | -79.5% |
| 2025 | +1.7% | -76.7% |
| 2026 | +2.0% | -58.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CI and INTS good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.30, CI and INTS have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CI and INTS?
The CI/INTS correlation stands at -0.30 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.65, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is INTS a good diversifier for CI?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.30, CI and INTS have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.30 mean?
A reading of -0.30 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ci-vs-ints.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ci-vs-ints/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CI correlations · INTS correlations
