PairBook
HomeCI › CI vs SLGN

CI vs SLGN: Correlation

Cigna (CI) and Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.48.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.48
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.51
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.39
long-run
Ann. covariance
376.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CI and SLGN?

On 3 years of weekly data the CI/SLGN correlation comes out at 0.48, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.51 over 1 year against 0.48 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.39, and annualized covariance runs at 376.7 %².

In CI's tracked universe of 30 assets, SLGN sits right near the top at #2. Neither side won the trailing year by much: -5.4% against -7.9%.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CI vs SLGN: side by side

CI (Cigna)SLGN (Silgan Holdings Inc.)
1-year return-5.4%-7.9%
5-year return+46.7%+5.9%
Volatility (ann.)26.7%29.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.220.58
Max drawdown (3Y)-32.1%-35.0%
Market cap$73.4B$4.4B
P/E (trailing)11.616.9
Dividend yield2.19%1.91%
Sector / categoryHealth CareUS Listed
Lower P/E: CI 11.6 vs 16.9Higher yield: CI 2.19% vs 1.91%Smaller drawdown: CI -32.1% vs -35.0%Higher 5y return: CI +46.7% vs +5.9%
-20%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CI · SLGN

Year-by-year returns

YearCISLGN
2022+46.7%+22.7%
2023-8.0%-11.3%
2024-6.3%+16.8%
2025+1.7%-21.1%
2026+2.0%+4.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CI and SLGN good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.48, CI and SLGN keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CI and SLGN?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.48 over 3 years, with 0.51 over the last year and 0.39 over 5 years.

Is SLGN a good diversifier for CI?

Reasonably. At 0.48, CI and SLGN keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.48 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ci-vs-slgn.json

CI vs SLGN: 3-year weekly correlation 0.48CI vs SLGN0.48

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![CI vs SLGN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ci-vs-slgn.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ci-vs-slgn/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CI correlations · SLGN correlations