PairBook
HomeCI › CI vs LIN

CI vs LIN: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Cigna (CI) and Linde plc (LIN) carry a correlation of 0.40, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.40
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.38
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.35
long-run
Ann. covariance
175.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CI and LIN?

Over the past 3 years, CI and LIN moved with a correlation of 0.40, which is moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.38 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.35, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 175.1 %².

By 3-year correlation, LIN places #10 of the 30 assets tracked against CI. Over the last 12 months LIN came out ahead by 7.3 percentage points (-5.4% against +1.9%). The rolling one-year correlation moved between 0.13 and 0.55 over the past three years, a moderate range. One caveat on sizing: CI is 1.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
How the one-year correlation itself moved over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CI vs LIN: side by side

CI (Cigna)LIN (Linde plc)
1-year return-5.4%+1.9%
5-year return+46.7%+64.6%
Volatility (ann.)26.7%16.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.220.37
Max drawdown (3Y)-32.1%-19.2%
Market cap$73.4B$223.7B
P/E (trailing)11.631.6
Dividend yield2.19%1.26%
Sector / categoryHealth CareMaterials
Lower P/E: CI 11.6 vs 31.6Higher yield: CI 2.19% vs 1.26%Smaller drawdown: LIN -19.2% vs -32.1%Higher 5y return: LIN +64.6% vs +46.7%
-20%0%+18%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CI · LIN

Year-by-year returns

YearCILIN
2022+46.7%-4.4%
2023-8.0%+27.7%
2024-6.3%+3.2%
2025+1.7%+3.2%
2026+2.0%+14.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CI and LIN good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.40 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CI and LIN?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.40 over 3 years, with 0.38 over the last year and 0.35 over 5 years.

Is LIN a good diversifier for CI?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.40 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.40 mean?

A reading of 0.40 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ci-vs-lin.json

CI vs LIN: 3-year weekly correlation 0.40CI vs LIN0.40

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CI vs LIN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ci-vs-lin.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ci-vs-lin/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CI correlations · LIN correlations