PairBook
HomeCALC › CALC vs QNCX

CALC vs QNCX: Correlation

How closely do CalciMedica, Inc. (CALC) and Quince Therapeutics, Inc. (QNCX) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.27, which is weak.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.27
weak
Correlation (1Y)
0.46
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
3544.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CALC and QNCX?

Over the past 3 years, CALC and QNCX moved with a correlation of 0.27, which is weak. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.46) than the 3-year average (0.27). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 3544.0 %².

Few assets follow CALC as closely as QNCX, which ranks #3 of 10 tracked partners. On 12-month performance CALC holds a 5.8-point edge, -83.8% against -89.6%.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CALC vs QNCX: side by side

CALC (CalciMedica, Inc.)QNCX (Quince Therapeutics, Inc.)
1-year return-83.8%-89.6%
5-year returnn/a-99.8%
Volatility (ann.)115.7%111.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.260.55
Max drawdown (3Y)-93.7%-98.2%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CALC -93.7% vs -98.2%
-95%0%+162%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CALC · QNCX

Year-by-year returns

YearCALCQNCX
2022-95.0%
2023+64.8%
2024+23.8%+78.1%
2025+86.2%+79.1%
2026-92.9%-95.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CALC and QNCX good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.27, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CALC and QNCX?

The CALC/QNCX correlation stands at 0.27 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.46, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is QNCX a good diversifier for CALC?

A fair diversifier. At 0.27, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.27 mean?

A reading of 0.27 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/calc-vs-qncx.json

CALC vs QNCX: 3-year weekly correlation 0.27CALC vs QNCX0.27

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![CALC vs QNCX correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/calc-vs-qncx.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/calc-vs-qncx/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CALC correlations · QNCX correlations