PairBook
HomeCALC › CALC vs ILLR

CALC vs ILLR: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, CalciMedica, Inc. (CALC) and Triller Group Inc. (ILLR) carry a correlation of -0.27, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.27
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.39
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-14409.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CALC and ILLR?

Over the past 3 years, CALC and ILLR moved with a correlation of -0.27, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.39) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.27). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -14409.8 %².

ILLR is close to the least connected end of CALC's tracked universe, ranking #8 of 10. Twelve-month performance is nearly a tie, at -83.8% for CALC and -79.6% for ILLR. Note the risk asymmetry: ILLR runs 4.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CALC vs ILLR: side by side

CALC (CalciMedica, Inc.)ILLR (Triller Group Inc.)
1-year return-83.8%-79.6%
5-year returnn/a-99.6%
Volatility (ann.)115.7%462.5%
Beta vs S&P 5000.262.45
Max drawdown (3Y)-93.7%-99.7%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CALC -93.7% vs -99.7%
-93%0%+184%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CALC · ILLR

Year-by-year returns

YearCALCILLR
2022-86.0%
2023-68.4%
2024+23.8%+137.0%
2025+86.2%-98.7%
2026-92.9%+207.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CALC and ILLR good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.27, CALC and ILLR have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CALC and ILLR?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CALC and ILLR is -0.27 over 3 years, -0.39 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is ILLR a good diversifier for CALC?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.27, CALC and ILLR have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/calc-vs-illr.json

CALC vs ILLR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.27CALC vs ILLR-0.27

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CALC vs ILLR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/calc-vs-illr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/calc-vs-illr/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CALC correlations · ILLR correlations