PairBook
HomeAVT › AVT vs CALC

AVT vs CALC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Avnet, Inc. (AVT) and CalciMedica, Inc. (CALC) carry a correlation of -0.29, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.29
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.53
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-957.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AVT and CALC?

Over the past 3 years, AVT and CALC moved with a correlation of -0.29, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.53 versus -0.29 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -957.7 %².

Among the 16 assets we track against AVT, CALC sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #13. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with AVT ahead by 154.1 points (+70.3% versus -83.8%). Note the risk asymmetry: CALC runs 4.1 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AVT vs CALC: side by side

AVT (Avnet, Inc.)CALC (CalciMedica, Inc.)
1-year return+70.3%-83.8%
5-year return+153.5%n/a
Volatility (ann.)28.1%115.7%
Beta vs S&P 5001.050.26
Max drawdown (3Y)-27.1%-93.7%
Market cap$7.5B
P/E (trailing)22.5
Dividend yield1.55%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: AVT 1.55% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: AVT -27.1% vs -93.7%
-85%0%+119%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. AVT · CALC

Year-by-year returns

YearAVTCALC
2022+3.4%
2023+24.4%
2024+6.4%+23.8%
2025-5.6%+86.2%
2026+92.1%-92.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AVT and CALC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.29, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AVT and CALC?

The AVT/CALC correlation stands at -0.29 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.53, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is CALC a good diversifier for AVT?

Yes: at -0.29, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.29 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.29 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/avt-vs-calc.json

AVT vs CALC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.29AVT vs CALC-0.29

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![AVT vs CALC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/avt-vs-calc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/avt-vs-calc/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AVT correlations · CALC correlations