PairBook
HomeBTI › BTI vs SLMT

BTI vs SLMT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, British American Tobacco Industries, p.l.c. (BTI) and Brera Holdings PLC - Class B (SLMT) carry a correlation of -0.20, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.33
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-613.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BTI and SLMT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BTI and SLMT correlate at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.33 versus -0.20 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -613.6 %².

Within BTI's tracked universe of 21 assets, SLMT comes in at #12 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: BTI led by 97.5 percentage points, +4.8% for BTI against -92.7% for SLMT. One caveat on sizing: SLMT is 6.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BTI vs SLMT: side by side

BTI (British American Tobacco Industries, p.l.c.)SLMT (Brera Holdings PLC - Class B)
1-year return+4.8%-92.7%
5-year return+119.4%n/a
Volatility (ann.)22.5%139.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.061.66
Max drawdown (3Y)-15.3%-98.8%
Market cap$121.2B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)14.5
Dividend yield4.27%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: BTI 4.27% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BTI -15.3% vs -98.8%
-94%0%+297%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BTI · SLMT

Year-by-year returns

YearBTISLMT
2022+15.1%
2023-20.1%
2024+35.4%+25.5%
2025+65.8%-77.3%
2026+2.2%-75.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BTI and SLMT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, BTI and SLMT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BTI and SLMT?

The BTI/SLMT correlation stands at -0.20 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.33, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SLMT a good diversifier for BTI?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.20, BTI and SLMT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bti-vs-slmt.json

BTI vs SLMT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20BTI vs SLMT-0.20

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BTI vs SLMT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bti-vs-slmt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bti-vs-slmt/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BTI correlations · SLMT correlations