PairBook
HomeBND › BND vs LPLA

BND vs LPLA: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) carry a correlation of -0.27, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.27
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.36
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.24
long-run
Ann. covariance
-48.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BND and LPLA?

On 3 years of weekly data the BND/LPLA correlation comes out at -0.27, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.36 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.24, and annualized covariance runs at -48.6 %².

Out of 33 assets tracked against BND, LPLA lands near the bottom at #30. Their 12-month results are close: +2.3% for BND against -0.9% for LPLA. One caveat on sizing: LPLA is 6.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BND vs LPLA: side by side

BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF)LPLA (LPL Financial Holdings Inc.)
1-year return+2.3%-0.9%
5-year return-1.3%+149.0%
Volatility (ann.)5.2%34.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.060.97
Max drawdown (3Y)-4.7%-33.2%
Market cap$28.4B
P/E (trailing)28.8
Dividend yield0.33%
Sector / categoryETF · BondsUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: BND -4.7% vs -33.2%Higher 5y return: LPLA +149.0% vs -1.3%
-19%0%+16%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BND · LPLA

Year-by-year returns

YearBNDLPLA
2022-13.1%+35.7%
2023+5.7%+5.9%
2024+1.4%+44.1%
2025+7.1%+9.8%
2026+0.2%+1.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BND and LPLA good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.27, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BND and LPLA?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BND and LPLA is -0.27 over 3 years, -0.36 over 1 year and -0.24 over 5 years.

Is LPLA a good diversifier for BND?

Yes: at -0.27, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bnd-vs-lpla.json

BND vs LPLA: 3-year weekly correlation -0.27BND vs LPLA-0.27

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BND vs LPLA correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bnd-vs-lpla.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bnd-vs-lpla/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BND correlations · LPLA correlations