PairBook
HomeBND › BND vs HAFN

BND vs HAFN: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and Hafnia Limited (HAFN) carry a correlation of -0.28, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.28
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.01
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-49.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BND and HAFN?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BND and HAFN correlate at -0.28, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.01) than the 3-year average (-0.28). Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -49.5 %².

HAFN is close to the least connected end of BND's tracked universe, ranking #32 of 33. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months HAFN outperformed by 53.8 percentage points (+2.3% for BND against +56.1% for HAFN). One caveat on sizing: HAFN is 7.4 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BND vs HAFN: side by side

BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF)HAFN (Hafnia Limited)
1-year return+2.3%+56.1%
5-year return-1.3%n/a
Volatility (ann.)5.2%38.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.060.70
Max drawdown (3Y)-4.7%-50.2%
Market cap$4.1B
P/E (trailing)8.6
Dividend yield9.42%
Sector / categoryETF · BondsUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: BND -4.7% vs -50.2%
-12%0%+59%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BND · HAFN

Year-by-year returns

YearBNDHAFN
2022-13.1%
2023+5.7%
2024+1.4%
2025+7.1%+5.4%
2026+0.2%+69.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BND and HAFN good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.28, BND and HAFN have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BND and HAFN?

The BND/HAFN correlation stands at -0.28 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.01, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is HAFN a good diversifier for BND?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.28, BND and HAFN have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?

A reading of -0.28 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bnd-vs-hafn.json

BND vs HAFN: 3-year weekly correlation -0.28BND vs HAFN-0.28

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BND vs HAFN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bnd-vs-hafn.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bnd-vs-hafn/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BND correlations · HAFN correlations