PairBook
HomeBMR › BMR vs QDEL

BMR vs QDEL: Correlation

How closely do Beamr Imaging Ltd. (BMR) and QuidelOrtho Corporation (QDEL) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.30, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.30
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.12
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-6369.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BMR and QDEL?

On 3 years of weekly data the BMR/QDEL correlation comes out at -0.30, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.12 versus -0.30 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -6369.0 %².

By 3-year correlation, QDEL places #31 of the 36 assets tracked against BMR. The trailing year gives QDEL the advantage: -57.8% versus -44.8%, a 13.0-point spread. Note the risk asymmetry: BMR runs 4.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BMR vs QDEL: side by side

BMR (Beamr Imaging Ltd.)QDEL (QuidelOrtho Corporation)
1-year return-57.8%-44.8%
5-year returnn/a-88.2%
Volatility (ann.)324.4%66.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.151.10
Max drawdown (3Y)-92.7%-88.1%
Market cap$1.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: QDEL -88.1% vs -92.7%
-64%0%+17%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BMR · QDEL

Year-by-year returns

YearBMRQDEL
2022-36.5%
2023-14.0%
2024+239.3%-39.6%
2025-68.1%-35.9%
2026-18.5%-46.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BMR and QDEL good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.30, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BMR and QDEL?

The BMR/QDEL correlation stands at -0.30 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.12, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is QDEL a good diversifier for BMR?

Yes: at -0.30, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.30 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.30 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bmr-vs-qdel.json

BMR vs QDEL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.30BMR vs QDEL-0.30

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BMR vs QDEL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bmr-vs-qdel.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bmr-vs-qdel/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BMR correlations · QDEL correlations