PairBook
HomeBMR › BMR vs SSRM

BMR vs SSRM: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Beamr Imaging Ltd. (BMR) and SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) carry a correlation of -0.42, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.42
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.17
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-8699.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BMR and SSRM?

Over the past 3 years, BMR and SSRM moved with a correlation of -0.42, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.17) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.42). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -8699.8 %².

SSRM is close to the least connected end of BMR's tracked universe, ranking #36 of 36. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months SSRM outperformed by 169.6 percentage points (-57.8% for BMR against +111.8% for SSRM). Risk is not evenly split, since BMR carries 5.0 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BMR vs SSRM: side by side

BMR (Beamr Imaging Ltd.)SSRM (SSR Mining Inc.)
1-year return-57.8%+111.8%
5-year returnn/a+149.2%
Volatility (ann.)324.4%64.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.150.98
Max drawdown (3Y)-92.7%-73.4%
Market cap$8.0B
P/E (trailing)14.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.08%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: SSRM 0.08% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: SSRM -73.4% vs -92.7%
-55%0%+85%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BMR · SSRM

Year-by-year returns

YearBMRSSRM
2022-10.0%
2023-29.9%
2024+239.3%-35.3%
2025-68.1%+214.9%
2026-18.5%+78.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BMR and SSRM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.42, BMR and SSRM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BMR and SSRM?

The BMR/SSRM correlation stands at -0.42 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.17, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SSRM a good diversifier for BMR?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.42, BMR and SSRM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.42 mean?

A reading of -0.42 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bmr-vs-ssrm.json

BMR vs SSRM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.42BMR vs SSRM-0.42

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BMR vs SSRM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bmr-vs-ssrm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bmr-vs-ssrm/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BMR correlations · SSRM correlations