BMR vs GXAI: Correlation
How closely do Beamr Imaging Ltd. (BMR) and Gaxos.ai Inc. (GXAI) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.72, which is strong.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BMR and GXAI?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BMR and GXAI correlate at 0.72, strong. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.40) runs below the 3-year figure (0.72). Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of 44882.0 %².
Few assets follow BMR as closely as GXAI, which ranks #2 of 36 tracked partners. Neither side won the trailing year by much: -57.8% against -59.6%. Note the risk asymmetry: BMR runs 1.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BMR vs GXAI: side by side
| BMR (Beamr Imaging Ltd.) | GXAI (Gaxos.ai Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -57.8% | -59.6% |
| 5-year return | n/a | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 324.4% | 191.3% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.15 | 0.51 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -92.7% | -93.5% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BMR | GXAI |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | +239.3% | -37.0% |
| 2025 | -68.1% | -58.4% |
| 2026 | -18.5% | -24.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BMR and GXAI good diversifiers for each other?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.72 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BMR and GXAI?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BMR and GXAI is 0.72 over 3 years, 0.40 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.
Is GXAI a good diversifier for BMR?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.72 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
What does a correlation of 0.72 mean?
A reading of 0.72 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bmr-vs-gxai.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bmr-vs-gxai/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BMR correlations · GXAI correlations
