BMR vs MCO: Correlation
Beamr Imaging Ltd. (BMR) and Moody's Corporation (MCO) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.17.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BMR and MCO?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BMR and MCO correlate at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.22) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.17). Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -1388.2 %².
Among the 36 assets we track against BMR, MCO ranks #26 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MCO outperformed by 58.5 percentage points (-57.8% for BMR against +0.7% for MCO). Risk is not evenly split, since BMR carries 12.6 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BMR vs MCO: side by side
| BMR (Beamr Imaging Ltd.) | MCO (Moody's Corporation) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -57.8% | +0.7% |
| 5-year return | n/a | +39.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 324.4% | 25.8% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.15 | 1.08 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -92.7% | -24.7% |
| Market cap | – | $88.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 32.7 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.77% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Financials |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BMR | MCO |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | -28.0% |
| 2023 | – | +41.5% |
| 2024 | +239.3% | +22.2% |
| 2025 | -68.1% | +8.7% |
| 2026 | -18.5% | +0.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BMR and MCO good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.17, BMR and MCO have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BMR and MCO?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BMR and MCO is -0.17 over 3 years, 0.22 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.
Is MCO a good diversifier for BMR?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.17, BMR and MCO have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.17 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bmr-vs-mco.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bmr-vs-mco/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BMR correlations · MCO correlations