PairBook
HomeBMR › BMR vs MCO

BMR vs MCO: Correlation

Beamr Imaging Ltd. (BMR) and Moody's Corporation (MCO) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.17.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.22
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1388.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BMR and MCO?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BMR and MCO correlate at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.22) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.17). Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -1388.2 %².

Among the 36 assets we track against BMR, MCO ranks #26 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MCO outperformed by 58.5 percentage points (-57.8% for BMR against +0.7% for MCO). Risk is not evenly split, since BMR carries 12.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BMR vs MCO: side by side

BMR (Beamr Imaging Ltd.)MCO (Moody's Corporation)
1-year return-57.8%+0.7%
5-year returnn/a+39.4%
Volatility (ann.)324.4%25.8%
Beta vs S&P 5001.151.08
Max drawdown (3Y)-92.7%-24.7%
Market cap$88.2B
P/E (trailing)32.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.77%
Sector / categoryUS ListedFinancials
Higher yield: MCO 0.77% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MCO -24.7% vs -92.7%
-55%0%+16%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BMR · MCO

Year-by-year returns

YearBMRMCO
2022-28.0%
2023+41.5%
2024+239.3%+22.2%
2025-68.1%+8.7%
2026-18.5%+0.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BMR and MCO good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.17, BMR and MCO have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BMR and MCO?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BMR and MCO is -0.17 over 3 years, 0.22 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is MCO a good diversifier for BMR?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.17, BMR and MCO have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.17 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bmr-vs-mco.json

BMR vs MCO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17BMR vs MCO-0.17

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BMR vs MCO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bmr-vs-mco.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bmr-vs-mco/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BMR correlations · MCO correlations