BMR vs CPOP: Correlation
Beamr Imaging Ltd. (BMR) and Pop Culture Group Co., Ltd - Class A (CPOP) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.47.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BMR and CPOP?
Over the past 3 years, BMR and CPOP moved with a correlation of 0.47, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.25) than the 3-year average (0.47). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 19908.2 %².
By 3-year correlation, CPOP places #14 of the 36 assets tracked against BMR. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BMR ahead by 39.2 points (-57.8% versus -97.0%). Risk is not evenly split, since BMR carries 2.5 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BMR vs CPOP: side by side
| BMR (Beamr Imaging Ltd.) | CPOP (Pop Culture Group Co., Ltd - Class A) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -57.8% | -97.0% |
| 5-year return | n/a | -99.9% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 324.4% | 129.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.15 | 0.69 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -92.7% | -99.6% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BMR | CPOP |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | -78.5% |
| 2023 | – | -86.3% |
| 2024 | +239.3% | +9.3% |
| 2025 | -68.1% | -64.1% |
| 2026 | -18.5% | -91.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BMR and CPOP good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.47, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BMR and CPOP?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.47 over 3 years, with 0.25 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.
Is CPOP a good diversifier for BMR?
A fair diversifier. At 0.47, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.47 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bmr-vs-cpop.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bmr-vs-cpop/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BMR correlations · CPOP correlations
