BGSF vs HUM: Correlation
BGSF, Inc. (BGSF) and Humana (HUM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.20.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BGSF and HUM?
Over the past 3 years, BGSF and HUM moved with a correlation of -0.20, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.30 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.13, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -479.3 %².
HUM is close to the least connected end of BGSF's tracked universe, ranking #9 of 12. Over the last 12 months HUM came out ahead by 14.2 percentage points (+19.8% against +34.0%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BGSF vs HUM: side by side
| BGSF (BGSF, Inc.) | HUM (Humana) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +19.8% | +34.0% |
| 5-year return | -36.0% | +1.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 54.3% | 43.3% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.47 | 0.52 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -71.9% | -67.9% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $47.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 36.9 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.91% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Health Care |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BGSF | HUM |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +11.7% | +11.2% |
| 2023 | -35.1% | -9.9% |
| 2024 | -43.4% | -44.0% |
| 2025 | +23.0% | +2.4% |
| 2026 | +15.8% | +54.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BGSF and HUM good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BGSF and HUM?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.20 over 3 years, with -0.30 over the last year and -0.13 over 5 years.
Is HUM a good diversifier for BGSF?
Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?
A reading of -0.20 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bgsf-vs-hum.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bgsf-vs-hum/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BGSF correlations · HUM correlations
