PairBook
HomeBGSF › BGSF vs MSGS

BGSF vs MSGS: Correlation

BGSF, Inc. (BGSF) and Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.33.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.33
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.38
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.29
long-run
Ann. covariance
411.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BGSF and MSGS?

Over the past 3 years, BGSF and MSGS moved with a correlation of 0.33, which is moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.38 over 1 year against 0.33 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.29, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 411.2 %².

By 3-year correlation, MSGS places #5 of the 12 assets tracked against BGSF. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MSGS outperformed by 80.8 percentage points (+19.8% for BGSF against +100.6% for MSGS). Note the risk asymmetry: BGSF runs 2.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BGSF vs MSGS: side by side

BGSF (BGSF, Inc.)MSGS (Madison Square Garden Sports Corp.)
1-year return+19.8%+100.6%
5-year return-36.0%+131.3%
Volatility (ann.)54.3%23.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.470.62
Max drawdown (3Y)-71.9%-25.5%
Market cap$0.1B$9.5B
P/E (trailing)1230.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MSGS -25.5% vs -71.9%Higher 5y return: MSGS +131.3% vs -36.0%
-24%0%+108%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BGSF · MSGS

Year-by-year returns

YearBGSFMSGS
2022+11.7%+10.5%
2023-35.1%-0.8%
2024-43.4%+24.1%
2025+23.0%+14.6%
2026+15.8%+52.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BGSF and MSGS good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.33, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BGSF and MSGS?

The BGSF/MSGS correlation stands at 0.33 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.38, 5 years: 0.29), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MSGS a good diversifier for BGSF?

A fair diversifier. At 0.33, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.33 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.33 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bgsf-vs-msgs.json

BGSF vs MSGS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.33BGSF vs MSGS0.33

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BGSF vs MSGS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bgsf-vs-msgs.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bgsf-vs-msgs/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BGSF correlations · MSGS correlations