BGSF vs OMH: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, BGSF, Inc. (BGSF) and Ohmyhome Limited - Class A (OMH) carry a correlation of -0.23, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BGSF and OMH?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BGSF and OMH correlate at -0.23, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.01 versus -0.23 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -5591.9 %².
Among the 12 assets we track against BGSF, OMH sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #10. The last year tells two different stories: BGSF led by 113.4 percentage points, +19.8% for BGSF against -93.6% for OMH. Risk is not evenly split, since OMH carries 8.3 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BGSF vs OMH: side by side
| BGSF (BGSF, Inc.) | OMH (Ohmyhome Limited - Class A) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +19.8% | -93.6% |
| 5-year return | -36.0% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 54.3% | 448.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.47 | -3.85 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -71.9% | -97.9% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BGSF | OMH |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +11.7% | – |
| 2023 | -35.1% | – |
| 2024 | -43.4% | -73.9% |
| 2025 | +23.0% | +102.0% |
| 2026 | +15.8% | -90.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BGSF and OMH good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BGSF and OMH?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BGSF and OMH is -0.23 over 3 years, -0.01 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.
Is OMH a good diversifier for BGSF?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.23 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bgsf-vs-omh.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bgsf-vs-omh/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BGSF correlations · OMH correlations
