PairBook
HomeBGS › BGS vs TTWO

BGS vs TTWO: Correlation

How closely do B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.18, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.18
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.33
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.04
long-run
Ann. covariance
-265.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BGS and TTWO?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BGS and TTWO correlate at -0.18, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.33) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.18). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.04, with an annualized covariance of -265.0 %².

Within BGS's tracked universe of 15 assets, TTWO comes in at #8 by 3-year correlation. The trailing year gives TTWO the advantage: -11.2% versus +0.4%, a 11.6-point spread. Note the risk asymmetry: BGS runs 2.0 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BGS vs TTWO: side by side

BGS (B&G Foods, Inc.)TTWO (Take-Two Interactive)
1-year return-11.2%+0.4%
5-year return-80.9%+47.3%
Volatility (ann.)54.4%27.3%
Beta vs S&P 5000.090.85
Max drawdown (3Y)-63.6%-27.7%
Market cap$0.3B$43.6B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield18.84%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedCommunication Services
Higher yield: BGS 18.84% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: TTWO -27.7% vs -63.6%Higher 5y return: TTWO +47.3% vs -80.9%
-21%0%+34%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BGS · TTWO

Year-by-year returns

YearBGSTTWO
2022-60.7%-41.4%
2023+0.3%+54.6%
2024-28.3%+14.4%
2025-26.8%+39.1%
2026-14.2%-9.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BGS and TTWO good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.18, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BGS and TTWO?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BGS and TTWO is -0.18 over 3 years, -0.33 over 1 year and -0.04 over 5 years.

Is TTWO a good diversifier for BGS?

Yes: at -0.18, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.18 mean?

A reading of -0.18 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bgs-vs-ttwo.json

BGS vs TTWO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.18BGS vs TTWO-0.18

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BGS vs TTWO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bgs-vs-ttwo.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bgs-vs-ttwo/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BGS correlations · TTWO correlations