BGS vs GDRX: Correlation
How closely do B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and GoodRx Holdings, Inc. (GDRX) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.40, which is moderate.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BGS and GDRX?
On 3 years of weekly data the BGS/GDRX correlation comes out at 0.40, moderate. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at 0.27 versus 0.40 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is 0.34, and annualized covariance runs at 1360.4 %².
By 3-year correlation, GDRX places #5 of the 15 assets tracked against BGS. On 12-month performance BGS holds a 10.8-point edge, -11.2% against -22.0%.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BGS vs GDRX: side by side
| BGS (B&G Foods, Inc.) | GDRX (GoodRx Holdings, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -11.2% | -22.0% |
| 5-year return | -80.9% | -90.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 54.4% | 62.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.09 | 1.14 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -63.6% | -79.3% |
| Market cap | $0.3B | $1.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 58.5 |
| Dividend yield | 18.84% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BGS | GDRX |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -60.7% | -85.7% |
| 2023 | +0.3% | +43.8% |
| 2024 | -28.3% | -30.6% |
| 2025 | -26.8% | -41.7% |
| 2026 | -14.2% | +29.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BGS and GDRX good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.40, BGS and GDRX keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BGS and GDRX?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.40 over 3 years, with 0.27 over the last year and 0.34 over 5 years.
Is GDRX a good diversifier for BGS?
Reasonably. At 0.40, BGS and GDRX keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.40 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bgs-vs-gdrx.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bgs-vs-gdrx/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BGS correlations · GDRX correlations
