PairBook
HomeBCS › BCS vs MDWD

BCS vs MDWD: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Barclays PLC (BCS) and MediWound Ltd. (MDWD) carry a correlation of 0.39, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.39
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.30
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.35
long-run
Ann. covariance
626.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BCS and MDWD?

Over the past 3 years, BCS and MDWD moved with a correlation of 0.39, which is moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.30 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.35, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 626.0 %².

Out of 15 assets tracked against BCS, MDWD lands near the bottom at #11. The last year tells two different stories: BCS led by 58.7 percentage points, +36.6% for BCS against -22.1% for MDWD. One caveat on sizing: MDWD is 1.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BCS vs MDWD: side by side

BCS (Barclays PLC)MDWD (MediWound Ltd.)
1-year return+36.6%-22.1%
5-year return+214.7%-47.2%
Volatility (ann.)30.9%51.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.270.98
Max drawdown (3Y)-26.2%-42.9%
Market cap$90.3B$0.2B
P/E (trailing)10.3
Dividend yield0.42%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: BCS 0.42% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BCS -26.2% vs -42.9%Higher 5y return: BCS +214.7% vs -47.2%
-19%0%+46%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BCS · MDWD

Year-by-year returns

YearBCSMDWD
2022-21.9%-18.3%
2023+6.0%-24.6%
2024+76.3%+75.0%
2025+96.5%+3.7%
2026+8.0%-28.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BCS and MDWD good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.39, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BCS and MDWD?

The BCS/MDWD correlation stands at 0.39 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.30, 5 years: 0.35), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MDWD a good diversifier for BCS?

A fair diversifier. At 0.39, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.39 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bcs-vs-mdwd.json

BCS vs MDWD: 3-year weekly correlation 0.39BCS vs MDWD0.39

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BCS vs MDWD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bcs-vs-mdwd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bcs-vs-mdwd/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BCS correlations · MDWD correlations