BCML vs RGCO: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, BayCom Corp (BCML) and RGC Resources Inc. (RGCO) carry a correlation of 0.50, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BCML and RGCO?
On 3 years of weekly data the BCML/RGCO correlation comes out at 0.50, moderate. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at 0.35 versus 0.50 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is 0.38, and annualized covariance runs at 383.0 %².
Within BCML's tracked universe of 14 assets, RGCO comes in at #7 by 3-year correlation. Neither side won the trailing year by much: +2.1% against +1.9%.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BCML vs RGCO: side by side
| BCML (BayCom Corp) | RGCO (RGC Resources Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +2.1% | +1.9% |
| 5-year return | +92.9% | +10.2% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 24.7% | 31.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.55 | 0.66 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -19.7% | -19.2% |
| Market cap | $0.3B | $0.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | 25.0 | 16.2 |
| Dividend yield | 3.81% | 3.91% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BCML | RGCO |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +2.2% | -0.6% |
| 2023 | +26.9% | -4.1% |
| 2024 | +16.0% | +2.5% |
| 2025 | +13.0% | +10.4% |
| 2026 | +4.0% | +5.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BCML and RGCO good diversifiers for each other?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.50 means BCML and RGCO share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BCML and RGCO?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.50 over 3 years, with 0.35 over the last year and 0.38 over 5 years.
Is RGCO a good diversifier for BCML?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.50 means BCML and RGCO share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
What does a correlation of 0.50 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.50 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bcml-vs-rgco.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bcml-vs-rgco/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BCML correlations · RGCO correlations
