BCML vs FFBC: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, BayCom Corp (BCML) and First Financial Bancorp. (FFBC) carry a correlation of 0.77, a strong link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BCML and FFBC?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BCML and FFBC correlate at 0.77, strong. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.61) than the 3-year average (0.77). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.65, with an annualized covariance of 535.9 %².
By 3-year correlation, FFBC places #4 of the 14 assets tracked against BCML. The last year tells two different stories: FFBC led by 24.6 percentage points, +2.1% for BCML against +26.7% for FFBC.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BCML vs FFBC: side by side
| BCML (BayCom Corp) | FFBC (First Financial Bancorp.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +2.1% | +26.7% |
| 5-year return | +92.9% | +69.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 24.7% | 28.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.55 | 0.81 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -19.7% | -26.1% |
| Market cap | $0.3B | $3.4B |
| P/E (trailing) | 25.0 | 11.6 |
| Dividend yield | 3.81% | 3.05% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BCML | FFBC |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +2.2% | +3.4% |
| 2023 | +26.9% | +2.4% |
| 2024 | +16.0% | +17.6% |
| 2025 | +13.0% | -3.3% |
| 2026 | +4.0% | +33.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BCML and FFBC good diversifiers for each other?
To a limited degree. At 0.77 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BCML and FFBC?
The BCML/FFBC correlation stands at 0.77 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.61, 5 years: 0.65), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is FFBC a good diversifier for BCML?
To a limited degree. At 0.77 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.
What does a correlation of 0.77 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bcml-vs-ffbc.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bcml-vs-ffbc/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BCML correlations · FFBC correlations
