PairBook
HomeBA › BA vs RETO

BA vs RETO: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Boeing (BA) and ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. - Class A Shares (RETO) carry a correlation of -0.14, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.14
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.13
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.09
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2099.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BA and RETO?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BA and RETO correlate at -0.14, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.13) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.14). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.09, with an annualized covariance of -2099.8 %².

By 3-year correlation, RETO places #28 of the 37 assets tracked against BA. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BA ahead by 85.4 points (-10.9% versus -96.3%). One caveat on sizing: RETO is 11.0 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BA vs RETO: side by side

BA (Boeing)RETO (ReTo Eco-Solutions, Inc. - Class A Shares)
1-year return-10.9%-96.3%
5-year return-3.6%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)36.4%399.9%
Beta vs S&P 5001.43-2.83
Max drawdown (3Y)-48.3%-99.5%
Market cap$165.9B
P/E (trailing)76.3
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryIndustrialsUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: BA -48.3% vs -99.5%Higher 5y return: BA -3.6% vs -100.0%
-96%0%+10%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BA · RETO

Year-by-year returns

YearBARETO
2022-5.4%-75.9%
2023+36.8%-99.1%
2024-32.1%-74.9%
2025+22.7%-57.1%
2026-3.3%-81.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BA and RETO good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.14 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BA and RETO?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.14 over 3 years, with 0.13 over the last year and -0.09 over 5 years.

Is RETO a good diversifier for BA?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.14 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.14 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.14 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/ba-vs-reto.json

BA vs RETO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.14BA vs RETO-0.14

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BA vs RETO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/ba-vs-reto.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/ba-vs-reto/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BA correlations · RETO correlations